BlackHartBlackHart
Scores/Jupiter

Jupiter

DAMASCUS

DEX Aggregator · Solana · $2B+ TVL · 8 contracts

Official site: jup.ag ↗

794
3004756508251000
Confidence74%
Z-Factor0.82
Updated 2026-05-27Public score

Security Profile

Access Ctrl
60
Economic
82
Oracle
95
Compos.
100
Govern.
82
Maturity
60
Resilience
50
Supply Ch.
75
OpSec
55
Cascade
95
Min
50
Avg
75
Max
100

Audit History

OtterSec
2023-06
Offside Labs
2024-01

Bug Bounty Program

$500,000
Max payout on Self-hosted
View Program

Assessment

Largest Solana DEX aggregator with 55+ months live. Clean exploit history and dominant market position. Program authority centralization and expanding product surface (perps, launchpad) are main considerations.

Dimension Breakdown

Methodology
Access Control
Weight 18% · 74% confidence
60
+15Program authority controls upgrades
+15Limit order and DCA programs separate
+15Multisig for emergency actions
+15Permissionless swap routing
Provenance
Economic Soundness
Weight 13% · 74% confidence
82
+20DEX aggregator model proven
+20JUP tokenomics with staking
+20Fee structure transparent
+20Swap routing optimization
Provenance
Oracle Integrity
Weight 13% · 74% confidence
95
+32Pyth and Switchboard oracle integration
+32Price impact checks on swaps
-5No single oracle dependency
+32Oracle quality depends on underlying DEXs
Provenance
Battle-Tested Maturity
Weight 12% · 74% confidence
60
+15Live since October 2021 (55+ months)
+15Largest Solana DEX aggregator
+15Zero protocol-level exploits
+15Multiple product launches
Provenance
Governance & Upgradeability
Weight 10% · 74% confidence
82
+27JUP DAO governance
+27Active Stellar DAO participation
-18Program authority still centralized
+27Governance maturing
Provenance
Adversarial Resilienceredacted
Weight 10% · 30% confidence
50
  • No validated adversarial findings — score set to neutral baseline
Provenance
Operational Security
Weight 10% · 74% confidence
55
+14Professional team operations
+14Active monitoring
+14Fast incident response demonstrated
+14Multi-product ops coordination
Provenance
Compositional Risk
Weight 5% · 74% confidence
100
+25Deep Solana ecosystem integration
+25Routes through multiple DEXs
+25Perpetual exchange adds complexity
+25Launchpad adds additional surface
Provenance
Cascade Exposure
Weight 5% · 50% confidence
95
+48No cross-protocol cascade exposure detected
+48Source: cross_protocol_composition.json dependency analysis
Provenance
Supply Chain
Weight 4% · 74% confidence
75
+19Rust/Anchor framework
+19Solana program dependencies
+19Verified programs
+19Standard Solana stack
Provenance

Top Score Drivers

Dimensions with the greatest marginal impact on BRI.

Access Control
60+47.6 potential
Program authority controls upgrades
Adversarial Resilience
50+35.4 potential
Battle-Tested Maturity
60+31.2 potential
Live since October 2021 (55+ months)
Operational Security
55+30.4 potential
Professional team operations
Economic Soundness
82+12.9 potential
DEX aggregator model proven

Adversarial Risk Signals

Publicly verifiable security posture indicators.

Disclosure HistoryNot Assessed
Remediation VelocityNot Assessed
Bug Bounty ProgramNot Assessed
Audit CoverageNot Assessed
Incident HistoryNot Assessed
Deployed 2021-10-0110 dimensionsProvenance Ledger
methodology v2.1formula v1.1weights v1.1evidence sha256:sha256:c...

Score History & Verification

Score provenance tracking begins with the next reassessment.

Full provenance ledger

On-Chain Data

Protocol Slug
"jupiter"
Oracle
BRORegistry (Base)
Evidence
IPFS (pinned)
Staleness Threshold
24 hours
Read Score
registry.getScore("jupiter")
Reduce exploitable risk

Continuous adversarial analysis, vulnerability detection, and verified reassessment.

View PlansMethodology

Embed this score

Live, updates automatically. Free for any site. Click-through links open the full report on BlackHart.

Public
Style
Theme
Format
Preview
Copy iframe code
<iframe
  src="https://blackhart.io/embed/oracle/jupiter?variant=card&theme=dark"
  title="BlackHart Risk Index: Jupiter"
  width="340"
  height="290"
  frameborder="0"
  loading="lazy"
  style="border:0; max-width:100%;"
></iframe>
Believe this score contains a factual error? Submit evidence for review