Scores/RedStone

RedStone

TEMPERED

Oracle Infrastructure · Multi-chain · N/A (oracle) TVL · 5 contracts

Official site: redstone.finance ↗

747

3004756508251000

Confidence63%

Z-Factor0.68

Updated 2026-05-27Public score

Security Profile

Access Control
72

Economic Soundness
75

Oracle Integrity
78

Compositional Risk
60

Governance
48

Maturity
52

Resilience
50

Supply Chain
75

Op Security
54

Cascade Exposure
100

Access Ctrl
72

Economic
75

Oracle
78

Compos.
60

Govern.
48

Maturity
52

Resilience
50

Supply Ch.
75

OpSec
54

Cascade
100

Min

Avg

Max

100

Audit History

Peckshield

2023-08

ABDK

2023-05

Quantstamp

2024-01

Bug Bounty Program

$250,000

Max payout on Cantina

View Program

Assessment

Modular oracle protocol competing with Chainlink (28 months). D5 low (48) for centralized governance. D6 moderate (52) for limited maturity. Innovative calldata-based model but newer attack surface. D4 low (60) as oracle failures cascade to consumers.

Dimension Breakdown

Methodology

Access Control

Weight 18% · 70% confidence

+18Data provider whitelist controlled by team

+18Relayer access for push-based feeds

+18On-demand pull model reduces admin surface

+18Provider authorization centrally managed

Provenance

Economic Soundness

Weight 13% · 68% confidence

+19Oracle service fee model (not DeFi lending)

+19No direct economic exploit surface in core

+19Data provider staking mechanism

+19Lower economic attack surface than DeFi protocols

Provenance

Oracle Integrity

Weight 13% · 75% confidence

+26Modular oracle design (Core, Classic, X models)

+26Multi-provider data aggregation

+26EVM calldata-based price injection (innovative but novel)

-22Deduction: calldata model is newer attack surface vs storage

Provenance

Battle-Tested Maturity

Weight 12% · 60% confidence

+13Live since early 2023 (~28 months)

+13Growing adoption but still establishing track record

+13No known exploit but limited stress history

+13Z-factor: 0.824

Provenance

Governance & Upgradeability

Weight 10% · 60% confidence

+16Team-controlled protocol parameters

-52No on-chain governance mechanism

+16Data provider set controlled centrally

+16Limited decentralization of oracle operations

Provenance

Adversarial Resilienceredacted

Weight 10% · 30% confidence

Maximum resilience under independent adversarial testing
Comprehensive security coverage across all attack surfaces
Mature codebase with extensive battle testing
No validated adversarial findings — score set to neutral baseline

Provenance

Operational Security

Weight 10% · 35% confidence

-46No branch protection detected

+14No CI/CD pipeline detected

+14Moderate development (17 commits/month)

+14No CI pipeline for deployment verification

Provenance

Compositional Risk

Weight 5% · 65% confidence

+15Oracle consumed by many DeFi protocols

+15Multi-chain deployment increases composition surface

+15Calldata injection model means consumer must integrate correctly

+15Integration errors can cause downstream failures

Provenance

Cascade Exposure

Weight 5% · 55% confidence

100

+33Appears in 1 cross-protocol cascade chain(s)

+33Member of 2 dependency cluster(s)

+33Source: cross_protocol_composition.json dependency analysis

Provenance

Supply Chain

Weight 4% · 70% confidence

+19Modern Solidity (0.8.x)

+19Standard dependencies

+19Multi-chain deployment infrastructure

+19Calldata injection adds unique supply chain element

Provenance

Top Score Drivers

Dimensions with the greatest marginal impact on BRI.

Battle-Tested Maturity

52+36.5 potential

Live since early 2023 (~28 months)

Governance & Upgradeability

48+34 potential

No on-chain governance mechanism

Adversarial Resilience

50+32.1 potential

Operational Security

54+28.4 potential

No branch protection detected

Access Control

72+27.2 potential

Data provider whitelist controlled by team

Adversarial Risk Signals

Publicly verifiable security posture indicators.

Disclosure HistoryNot Assessed

Remediation VelocityNot Assessed

Bug Bounty ProgramNot Assessed

Audit CoverageNot Assessed

Incident HistoryNot Assessed

Deployed 2023-01-0110 dimensionsProvenance Ledger

methodology v2.1formula v1.1weights v1.1evidence sha256:sha256:2...

Score History & Verification

Score provenance tracking begins with the next reassessment.

Full provenance ledger

On-Chain Data

Protocol Slug: "redstone"
Oracle: BRORegistry (Base)
Evidence: IPFS (pinned)
Staleness Threshold: 24 hours

Read Score

registry.getScore("redstone")

Reduce exploitable risk

Continuous adversarial analysis, vulnerability detection, and verified reassessment.

View Plans Methodology

Embed this score

Live, updates automatically. Free for any site. Click-through links open the full report on BlackHart.

Public

Style

Theme

Format

Preview

Copy iframe code

<iframe
  src="https://blackhart.io/embed/oracle/redstone?variant=card&theme=dark"
  title="BlackHart Risk Index: RedStone"
  width="340"
  height="290"
  frameborder="0"
  loading="lazy"
  style="border:0; max-width:100%;"
></iframe>

Believe this score contains a factual error? Submit evidence for review